The Decision Journal: Improve Your Decision-Making

The decision that changed how I think about decisions happened in a conference room three years ago. I was watching my manager deliberate over a critical project. Six months of work and three teams were on the line. Before deciding, she pulled up a simple document—a log of past decisions. Not just what was decided, but what she expected to happen, why she believed it would work, and what actually occurred months later. She scrolled to a similar decision from a year ago. "See this? I was convinced we'd ship in three months. We took five. But look here—I correctly identified the API integration as the biggest risk. I just underestimated how much." I was struck by her honesty. Most leaders would have said "I knew it would take longer" after the fact. But here was proof of what she actually thought at the time. That day, I started keeping my own decision journal. It transformed how I approach every important choice.

The Problem with How We Usually Decide

Once I started paying attention, I noticed something: we constantly rewrite history in our heads. A product launch succeeds, and suddenly everyone "knew it would work"—even though half the team was skeptical before launch. A hire doesn't work out, and the same people who approved the candidate now say they "had concerns from the start." This isn't dishonesty. It's how human memory works. Our brains automatically reconstruct the past to make sense of the present. Psychologists call it hindsight bias, and everyone does it. The problem? If you can't remember what you actually thought before a decision, you can't learn from it. You just get better at telling yourself convincing stories. A decision journal breaks this cycle. It's a timestamped record of what you actually believed before you knew how things would turn out.

What Goes in a Decision Journal

When I started my journal, I kept it simple. Three core elements:

• What I believed would happen
• Why I believed it (my reasoning and assumptions)
• What I planned to do about it

I write before making the decision, add notes during execution, and reflect after seeing the outcome. No complex templates. No expensive software. Just a Google Doc with dated entries. The key insight? The system has to be simple enough to use when you're stressed, busy, and under pressure. Because that's exactly when you need it most.

Five Decision Traps a Journal Helps You Avoid

After a year of journaling, I identified five patterns that repeatedly threw my decisions off track:

1. Judging Decisions by Results Alone

I made a hire that looked perfect on paper. Six months later, the person quit. Bad decision, right? Not necessarily. When I reviewed my journal entry, I saw that my reasoning was sound. The role was clearly defined, the candidate's experience matched perfectly, references were strong. What I couldn't predict: the candidate's spouse got a dream job in another country. Good process, unlucky outcome. The lesson: keep refining the process, don't beat yourself up over things you couldn't control. Journal fix: Record your reasoning and probability estimates before you know the outcome.

2. The Planning Fallacy

My team estimated a feature would take three weeks. It took seven. Looking back at my journal, I found the same pattern repeated. We were systematically optimistic about timelines, especially for projects with external dependencies. Now I add a "base rate" check: what do projects like this usually take? That outside view often reveals my inside view is wishful thinking. Journal fix: Track your estimates vs. actuals. After 10 entries, you'll see your personal bias clearly.

3. Confirmation Bias

I was excited about a new tool for the team. I spent hours reading positive reviews, watching demos, imagining how it would improve our workflow. What I didn't do: actively search for reasons it might fail. When I added a "counter-evidence" section to my template, I forced myself to write three reasons the decision might be wrong. It's uncomfortable. It also saves me from charging into bad bets. Journal fix: Before finalizing any decision, write three reasons you might be wrong.

4. Availability Heuristic

A dramatic recent event distorts how you see risk. One security incident, and suddenly security is "the top priority" for six months—even if other risks are statistically more likely. My journal shows me when I'm overweighting recent or vivid examples. If I made a similar decision six months ago without that concern, it's a signal to check whether the new information actually changes the calculus. Journal fix: Review similar past decisions before making new ones.

5. Emotional State Blindness

Some of my worst decisions came when I was tired, stressed, or running on adrenaline from a recent success. Now I log my emotional state alongside the decision. It's a two-word check: "stressed/rushed" or "calm/rested." When I review decisions that went wrong, there's often a pattern. Journal fix: Note how you feel when you decide. Patterns emerge.

A Simple Decision Journal Template

Here's the template I use. One page, no fluff: DECISION JOURNAL ENTRY Date: [When you're making the decision] Decision: [What you're choosing to do] Expected Outcome: [What you think will happen] Confidence Level: [High / Medium / Low] Key Reasoning:

• Reason 1: [Why this will work]
• Reason 2: [Supporting evidence]
• Reason 3: [What makes you confident]

Counter-Evidence (Required):

• [Three reasons this might be wrong]

Pre-Mortem: [If this fails spectacularly, what's the most likely cause?] Emotional State: [How are you feeling right now?] Review Date: [When will you check the outcome?]

---

POST-DECISION REVIEW (fill in later) Actual Outcome: [What happened] Process Grade: [A-F, judging the process not the result] What I Learned: [One key insight]

When to Use It (And When Not To)

I don't journal every decision. That would be exhausting and unsustainable. Use the journal for:

• Decisions that are hard to reverse
• Choices involving significant money, time, or relationships
• Situations where you've been wrong before
• Any decision you'll want to review in 6+ months

Skip the journal for:

• Easily reversible choices
• Low-stakes daily decisions
• Situations where speed matters more than precision

The goal isn't to document everything. It's to document the decisions worth learning from.

Making Better Decisions in Practice

Beyond the journal itself, here are tactics that improved my decision quality: Write the post-mortem before deciding. Imagine the decision failed. What went wrong? This "pre-mortem" surfaces risks you'd otherwise overlook. Seek disconfirming evidence. Before major decisions, ask: "What would change my mind?" Then actually look for that information. Create a decision-making checklist. Not for every choice, but for recurring decisions (hiring, project prioritization, vendor selection). Checklists prevent you from skipping steps when you're rushed. Involve a devil's advocate. Ask someone to argue against your preferred option for 10 minutes. Make it safe to poke holes. Sleep on hot decisions. A 24-hour pause filters out decisions driven by temporary emotion.

Common Questions

Is this worth the time?
It costs 15 minutes up front but saves hours later by eliminating rework and second-guessing. Plus, you build a library of patterns that speeds up future decisions. Can you do this solo?
Absolutely. I do my pre-mortems alone most of the time. Once a month, I ask a trusted friend to review my "counter-evidence" sections for blind spots. What if the outcome is bad?
Grade the process, not the result. A good process with a bad outcome means you got unlucky. A bad process with a good outcome means you got lucky. Focus on improving the process. Which tool is best?
I use Google Docs. Other people swear by Notion's databases or Obsidian's linked notes. The method matters more than the app. Start with whatever you'll actually use.

Start Simpler Than You Think

If I could go back and give myself one piece of advice, it would be this: Start simpler than you think you need to. Your first version will feel embarrassingly basic. That's perfect. Use it for three months before adding any complexity. My first entries were just three bullets:

• What I'm choosing
• Why I think it'll work
• What I'll watch for

That was enough. The habit mattered more than the template. Now, two years in, I have a system that's transformed how I think about choices. Not perfect. Not fancy. But consistently better than deciding by gut feel and hoping for the best. The journal doesn't make me right more often. It makes me wrong less expensively, and it helps me learn faster when I am wrong. That's worth 20 minutes a week.

---

Want to build better decision systems into your weekly routine? Check out How to Organize Your Week for a complete weekly review framework. When decisions don't go as planned, developing a growth mindset can help you extract lessons without harsh self-judgment.